Complaining about What is scarring people in these days is the possibility of
cloning discoveries. At this point the question is: how this discovery will
affect our society? And what is the scientists goal?. We all are worried about
this discovery because what come out from scientists it is not really
reassuring. Even scientists don’t know what will be the long- term’s effects of
“playing” with genes if they might have bad results on patient's descendants.
Moreover, by altering the natural course of nature on people, making them
thinner, healthier we might increase marginalizazion and discrimination of
people who can’t or just don’t want to be genetically enhanced. In response to
pressure from society, We should stop and think before allowed scientists to go
on without strict controls. All the attention these days to concerns about human
cloning has pushed other controversial areas of medical science into shadows.
The first attempts are to carry out genetic enhancement in humans could soon be
under way. The goal of genetic enhancement is not to treat people with diseases
or abnormalities, but to make healthy people more attractive. To do so, it would
employ the recombinant- DNA techniques from monocular biology that emerged in
the 1970s. This permits scientists to remove individual genes from one organism
and introduce them into another, even on another species. Although we belief
that The therapy aims to overcome health problems by giving the effected
individuals the normal- or functioning- gene. Allowing genetic enhancement in
more than a few very special cases poses real problems. First, the risks to the
patient at present are very great compared with the possible benefits. We sill
know very little about how they act- a single gene can have multiple effects in
different parts of the body. Moreover, genes do not act alone: the ire effects
are amplified, demitted, or counterbalanced by others genes in ways that we do
not understand.
We might be willing to expose a patient to great risks to treat grave
disease. Subjecting someone risk is ethically unacceptable if the person seeking
treatment is healthy. Second, genetic enhancement may pose risks to others,
particularly to patient's offspring. We do not know whether gene therapy might
contaminate the genetic material of the gonads. Because of this, genetic
enhancement might create serious enhancement unacceptably high when weighed
against the possible benefits. Genetic enhancement might reinforce irrational
societal prejudices. People who do not wish to be genetically enhanced
eventually night be marginalized or suffer discrimination. We should not simply
throw up hands and lament that nothing can be done to stop genetic enhancement.
Instead, we need to decide what enhancements we consider unacceptable, and to
prevent their use. A helpful model is the moratorium that scientists imposed on
themselves in the early 197’s, when they had just discovered how to manipulate
genetic material trough recombinant DNA techniques. If we do not establish some
guidelines now, we are likely to find ourselves focusing only on the short term
interests of an individual patient. Allowing the anxieties and biases of the
moment to blur our judgement. Nor should we leave decisions about genetic
enhancement to the whims of the market place or in the hands of patients or
families. This may be too easily swayed by messages in the media about what
standards of appearance, and behavior are acceptable. We need to decide what
enhancements we consider unacceptable, and prevent their use. Furthermore
sometimes we forget the real importance of a human life, too often scientists
treat human as animals because of their experiments. We all want to live in a
good world preferably without any kind of illness, but if this means destroy our
nature may be is time to think watts we are doing and were we are going to end.
Medicine exists since the humane race exists, but in the past was different; it
was an armless medicine created in order to take care of real ill people. On the
other hand whiteout out the progress in medicine we won’t survey in this way. We
can certainly affirm that we have a cure for almost everything: beginning from
the fever and ending.
Bibliography
.personal notes
Words: 693
