|
Artificial Intelligence Artificial intelligence is a highly debatable topic.
You either believe that it may be achieved or think it can't, and the middle is
a little shady. Artificial Intelligence is the study to create a machine that
can act like a human brain, including emotions, and consciousness. This speech
will cover the subject of if it can ever be achieved and at what level. This
would be a giant technological step. If it is ever achieved, everyday activities
such as vacuuming, or laundry, would become automated. The leader in the field
of AI is actually not a business, but MIT's Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
It does more ground breaking research in the all fields of AI, including
robotics and neural networks, than any other facility in the world. First I will
describe the different techniques and fields that fall under AI. The first
technique that is used to create intelligent systems is the top-down approach.
That is when the computer is given a written set of directions such as IF that
is red, THEN go forward and it will go from there according to the program. This
technique was widely used back in the 1950's when AI was still a mysterious
subject, but it has major flaws. To write complex programs that take in all
their surroundings would take hundreds of thousands of lines of code, which no
one has the time to write. The newest technique that is being used is bottom-up.
That is the arrangement of data into a complex system where all information is
connected, like a brain, which is why it is also referred to as a neural
network. It is extremely complex and confusing at some points, so I won't
describe it here, but you don't need to understand it to answer the question at
hand. There are also many different fields of study that fall under AI. The
first field that I'll talk about is robotics. This field has been prospering in
the '90's. It is not so much the engineering for the robots that is causing the
standstill in functionality of these machines, but the computers that control
what they do, which is the problem with all forms of AI right now. There is also
database processing, which works with the way that a computer sorts and
retrieves information. And intelligent software agents that can tell you when to
buy and sell stock among many other things. But, what this speech mainly focuses
on is the theory behind all this, which has its own field. There are four
categories of viewpoints that one may have on this topic. A. All thinking is
computation; in particular, feelings of conscious awareness are evoked merely by
the carrying out of appropriate computations. B. Awareness is a feature of the
brain's physical action; and whereas any physical action can be simulated
computationally, computational simulation cannot by itself evoke awareness. C.
Appropriate physical action of the brain evokes awareness, but that physical
action cannot even be properly simulated computationally. D. Awareness cannot be
explained by physical, computational, or any other scientific terms. Penrose 12
All that says is that it all depends if the brain functions computationally or
physically (chemical reactions) and whether or not you believe that either of
those can be simulated by a machine or biological creation of some kind. We will
be dealing with viewpoint A and D. If you believe in viewpoint A than you
believe that computers can become aware of their surroundings. The word aware
means that it can take in its whole surroundings and make judgments and actions
for itself, which a giant leap from where AI is at now. It really depends on how
you view how the brain functions. Research is being done by neurobiologists to
unlock the secret of how the brain works. It could function by computation or
chemical reactions, no one is really sure. If you think that it is all done
computationally, and that humans can simulate it in a machine of some sort than
you believe in A. A is an implication of a highly operational attitude to
science, where, also, the physical world is taken to operate entirely
computational. Penrose 13. There has been no evidence that supports or denies
this viewpoint because the secret of how the brain works has not been solved,
yet. The viewpoint D, on the other hand totally rejects the whole idea that
computers, or any machine can achieve any form of intelligence that may be
mistaken for human action. The main reason for believers in this category is
from the work of a German mathematician named Kurt Goedel. He was a good friend
of Albert Einstein and helped him with his theory of relativity. He was more
into the question of logic. His Logic Theorem is highly complex and impossible
to explain in this speech. It pretty much says that logic is only a biological
process and cannot be simulated using any form of device or algorithms. Some how
he proved this using mathematics. His work is highly debatable and still only a
theory and that is why the viewpoint A is still a possibility. We will not get
into the B and C viewpoints because they are extremely hazy, and not very
precise. They pretty much say that you believe that the brain functions
computationally and physically, but cannot be simulated by any machine. Whereas
in D you believe the key to creating awareness in a machine will never be
reached. I, myself, believe that A, can and will be achieved. The boom of
technological advances in both the area of AI and Neurobiology force me to
believe in that viewpoint. My prediction is that it will be achieved by the year
2050. I'm not sure yet if it is going to be a good thing. Many jobs will be lost
due to automation. Hundreds of thousands of people will replaced with machines
that perform flawless and error free. And it would be cheaper to buy a machine
for $5,000 that can work for 10 years, than to pay someone $40,000 a year for 10
years, that is just simple math. AI is a very interesting field that is still in
the early stages. There have only been major advances in that field in the last
10 years and I believe that it will keep on going like that. Hopefully, when I
am old and can't function for myself I will have a computer that can do it all
for me.
Words: 1087
|