|
Guardians of Freedom? The first and truest ideals of democracy were embodied
in the political ideas of Andrew Jackson and the Jacksonian democrats. Calling
themselves the guardians of the United States Constitution, the Jacksonian
politicians engendered wide spread liberty under a government which represented
all men, rather than only the upper class. While some policies under the
democrats had evident flaws, they were, for the most part, eager social
reformers who strived to put the power of government into the hands of the
common citizens. The convictions and ideals of the Jacksonian Democrats can be
best illustrated through a passage written by George Henry Evans. Evans was an
editor with strong democratic principles who created “The Working Men’s
Declaration of Independence” (Doc. A). Within the declaration, Evans stresses
the importance of establishing democracy.
He uses words and phrases from
Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” to clarify his points and stress his
convictions. Stating the absolute “necessity of the organization of the party,”
Evans explains that it will be possible to prevent the upper class from
subverting the “indefeasible and fundamental privilege” of liberty. And finally,
Evans states that it is the common citizen’s right to use every constitutional
means necessary to “reform the abuses” and “provide new guards for future
security.” In doing so, he documented the characteristic attitude of the
majority of the country in the 1820’s and 1830’s. Evans was only one of the many Jacksonian democrats to contribute to the success of the party and to the
reforms that they made. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s opinion in the Supreme
Court Case of Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge was a capitalist decision
which was a typical response for a Jacksonian democrat (Doc. H). This decision
stated that while the Charter of 1785 allowed the Charles River Bridge to be
constructed, it did not prohibit any other bridges from being constructed.
Therefore, Taney decided that the capitalistic competition would be healthy for
the economy of the regions along the Charles River. In doing this, Taney was
eliminating the monopolies of the elite and creating equal economic
opportunities for all citizens. As a result, Taney contributed to one of the
major achievements of the Jacksonian Democrats - to create economic equality.
The President of the United States of America and leader of the Democratic
party, Andrew Jackson, was perhaps the most outspoken democrat of the time. He
used his position as leader of the country to give more power to the common man.
Even before his election as president, he succeeded in having the property
qualification eliminated, therefore, increasing the voting population
tremendously. Jackson became the first president truly elected by the common
man, rather than only high society.
For the first time in the history of the
nation, the middle class received the opportunity to participate in the
government that ruled them. Jackson did not stop with the reformation of the
election process. Instead, he attacked the Bank of the United States and vetoed
the re-charter for the institution. President Jackson explained that the bank’s
stock was held by only foreigners and a few hundred rich American citizens. As a
result, the bank maintained an “exclusive privilege of banking...” - “a
monopoly” (Doc. B). The Democrats believed the bank to be a tool of rich
oppression and a dangerous institution because the men in power were of the
highest class and utterly “irresponsible to the people.” So, President Jackson
vetoed the re-charter and it was closed. The money was dispersed into several
state banks and the monopoly was disintegrated. Indeed, the Democrats succeeded
in creating a new government for the rule of a society of middle class citizens.
And, the middle class began to prosper under the struggle for economic equality.
Visiting the United States in 1834, Harriet Martineau reported the prosperity of
the country (Doc. D). She discovered “the absence of poverty, gross ignorance,
and insolence of manner” as well as towns with newspapers and libraries. She
also reported on political debated with common citizens as judges. It is quite
clear that the expansion of suffrage, support for individual rights, and
advances of democratic society were responsible for the prosperity of the time.
However, it would be both irrational and naive to assume that the ideals of
Jacksonian democrats were without flaw. And it would be preposterous to conceive
a period in American history without its low points. This holds true for the
period of 1820 - 1830 as well. A number of middle class citizens misinterpreted
democratic reforms as an opportunity to disregard decorum and law. Philip Hone,
a Whig politician, wrote descriptions of riots which erupted in Philadelphia and
large Eastern cities (Doc. E). Middle class citizens who took advantage of
individual rights caused chaos and destruction. Yet, an understanding of human
nature is necessary to continue.
It must be expected that some people are unable
to handle the privileges of individualism, and a crowded city is the most likely
place for a riot to break out. Such is the situation even presently. Especially
in large cities, violence and rioting is not uncommon. A political party aimed
at better the nation can not be justly held responsible for the terrible
behavior of a few. The same principle holds true for the Acts and Resolutions of
South Carolina in 1835 (Doc. F). While the Jacksonian Democrats believed that
the only way to reform society was through constitutional means, South Carolina
did not abide by the same convictions. Instead, they used individual liberty to
over-rule the government. The South Carolina legislature decided to nullify the
Post Office Department (which violated the first amendment to the Constitution)
and outlaw abolition movements (thereby denying freedom of speech). Finally, the
soon-to-secceed South Carolina decided not to collect taxes on imports and
President Jackson decided they had gone too far. He threatened them with war in
order to restore rational behavior. Although is possible to show all the
positive and constructive reforms initiated by the Jacksonian Democrats, it is
impossible to ignore the tragic oppression of the Native Americans by President
Jackson. On the Trail of Tears, thousands of lives were senselessly ended en
route from Georgia to the western reservations. There can be no justification
for the terrible mistreatment the Indians had to endure. However, it is
necessary to look at the situation for that time period. While all white man
were now considered equal and the middle class was elevated, the Blacks and
Native Americans were not included.
Even Thomas Jefferson did not intend to
include either race when drafting the Declaration of Independence. So, while it
can not be excused, it becomes possible to comprehend how such a travesty might
occur. Despite several inevitable flaws in the time period, the Democrat’s
proclamation as “guardians of the United States Constitution, political
democracy, individual liberty, and economic equality” is quite valid. Indeed,
the Jacksonian Democrats succeed in the ambitions, and their avid social reforms
helped make the United States a more liberated and democratic nation.
|