|
“An Inspector Calls” by JB Priestly Differences & Comparisons between Mr B.
and Sheila Arthur Burling is the main man in the Burling family, and seems to
control it, i.e. whatever he says - goes! The play is set in an imaginary town
called Brumley, somewhere in the North of England. Mr. Burling has a selfish
attitude towards life, and also an attitude to only care for himself and family,
and basically forget everybody else, in fact, this is exactly what he tells a
speech on at the celebration of Sheila’s and Gerald’s engagement, “... a man has
to look after himself - and his family too, of course...” which gives the
impression of the selfishness, and also greed. Another example of this is when
he tells a speech about how it is the best day of his life, “Gerald, I’m going
to tell you frankly, without any pretenses, that your engagement with Sheila
means a lot to me.
She’ll make you happy, and I’m sure you’ll make her happy.
Your just the type of son-in-law I wanted...” makes people think whether he
wants them to get married for themselves, or for him, and whether it means a lot
to him sentimentally, or a lot to him in the business world. Burling’s first
priority is to make money, “It’s my duty to keep labour cost down” and is also a
social climber, and Sheila is engaged to the son of his “friendly” rival, which
is why it could mean a lot to him in the business world because Gerald’s father
is in a higher class than the Burling family. We can see that he is a man that
tries to “make everything better” by using his money, “Look inspector, I’d give
thousands...”. I think this may be a “domineering” attitude, because he wants to
dominate people, and do all he can to do it, which reflects on how he treats his
employee’s. In his factory, there is certain employees which ask for a pay rise,
but Burling refuses to pay more than “the going rate”. Burling can afford the
pay rise, but returns by sacking one member of the “strike” pack, Eva/Daisy
Smith. After this, Burling was blamed for starting the “domino” effect of
Eva/Daisy’s suicide, but refuses to accept the blame. Appearance plays a big
part of Burling as well. How he looks is very important to him indeed in the
respect that he always has to look “posh” and always dresses cleanly and smart.
I think he does this not because he always want to be clean and smart, but to
keep a good reputation with other high class people, and not to make them think
that he is any lower than themselves. When the inspector asks questions to/about
his family, he tries to protect his reputation by acting the innocent to the
questions, even though we know, that he knows the answers to the questions, but
wont tell them, to protect his reputation (hard to explain!!).
Burling cannot
see the consequences of neither his, nor his family’s actions. We know this
because Burling makes comments which seem ridiculous to us now, in the ‘90’s and
the year 2000. Things like the Titanic being unsinkable and that European nor
World war would never happen. According to Burling, war will never happen
because in his eyes, it would affect business, but Burling does not stop to
think that people may care more about things other than business, which is why
he cannot see the consequences of his own actions and is also another example of
the selfishness within him. Burling hates stealing. When Eric (Burling’s son)
steals £50 from Burliness office, he cares about nothing more than that he stole
from him, and the amount he stole (because £50 was quite a bit of money in
1912), and Burling wasn’t really concerned why Eric stole the money. Burling
then exclaims, “You dammed fool - why didn’t you come to me when you found
yourself in this mess?”. Eric’s reply indicates that Mr. Burling was never close
to his son, “Because you’re not the kind of chap a man could turn to when he’s
in trouble”. Such a response indicates that things aren’t going to improve much
after the play ends, and also indicates that there may be a bad family
relationship. Sheila is Mr. Burling and Mrs. Burling’s daughter, and is engaged
to Gerald, Burling’s rival. Sheila has a totally different attitude to Burling,
and we see this emphasized as the play progresses. She is very happy with life
at the beginning of the play, young, and attractive. Although her happiness is
about to be destroyed, as in her faith in her family. Her response to the
tragedy is one of the few encouraging things, which I think, came out of the
play.
She is genuinely upset with the death of Eva/Daisy, and learns from her
actions, unlike Burling. Not only she admits her faults and it seems as though
see takes too much guilt on her shoulders, but seems keen and anxious to change
her behavior in the future, “I’ll never do it again” she exclaims. I think
Sheila is aware of the mystery surrounding the inspector, yet realizes there is
no point in hiding the facts from him, which is also a totally different
attitude to Burling, because Burling seems to think he can hide the facts, and
it will be okay, but Sheila, unlike Burling is not bothered about impairing her
reputation, she is only bothered about the suicide. Sheila is amazed that her
parents have not learned anything from the episode, and thinks that even though
the inspector may be a hoax, I think she is convinced that her parents behaved
in an entirely unsuitable manner, the way they were hiding facts, etc. Eric
agrees with her, and is like Sheila in many ways. For example, Eric is also
amazed that their parents have not learned anything in the episode. Sheila’s
family have tried to block knowledge of everything that is unpleasant in life,
but Sheila respects the truth and her parents don’t know that she has more
knowledge of unpleasant things that happen, and sometimes even more than her
parents, e.g., Eric’s Drinking. At the start of the play, Sheila is selfish,
moody and has a bad temper, which she may get from her father. So at the
beginning, Sheila is rather like her father, but she cannot see this. One day,
her bad temper goes too far because Mrs. Burling says her dress does not suit
her, and Sheila unleashes her anger on Eva/Daisy, resulting her getting sacked
from the fashion store.
I think she regrets this later on, when she changes, and
sees how ill tempered and selfish she was, but makes no attempt to do anything
about it. Sheila does realize, in the end, the harm she has caused, and still
wonders why her parents cannot see what they have done. Although the inspector
does turn out to be a hoax, her parents seem to carry on as normal, especially
Arthur, because he is just happy that the scandal will not get out, thus Arthur
loosing his Knighthood, but, Eric and Sheila will probably never be the same
again, as they have learned what they have done. There are a couple of
comparisons between these two people, e.g., Arthur being selfish, and Sheila
being selfish (at the beginning of the story) but overall, these are two very
different people, the way they turn out in the end, and even the beginning when
they are a little like each other. I did enjoy this book, although I think there
should tell more about what the inspector actually is, instead of leaving it in
suspense, but it cant really be suspense because it doesn’t ever tell you what
he is, because it is the end of the story, and suspense is where you really want
to know what it is, but it will tell you in the end. I think suspense at the end
of a story is not good, because it puts a bad ending for the story, because you
really want to know the end, or something. English Essay - Peter
|