An Unlikely Murderer
One would think that crimes with such a “gruesome nature” would be committed
by “a hatchet-wielding maniac” as put by Russell Aiuto (1). But rather, the
suspect was that of “a church-going, Sunday-school-teaching, respectable,
spinster-daughter”(Aiuto 1). The young woman, Lizzie Borden, was charged with
the killing of her father and stepmother, “a crime worthy of Classical Greek
tragedy” (Aiuto 1). Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to research the life
and trial of Lizzie Borden in order to determine if she was innocent or guilty
of parricide, the murder of one’s parents. It was on the 19th of July, 1860,
that in Fall River, Massachusetts Lizzie Borden was born (Radin 268). She grew
up there alongside her father, Andrew Borden. He was a very prosperous man,
starting out as the town’s undertaker and ending up investing his profits into
the textile industry. When Lizzie made it in to her teens, Mr. Borden was worth
$500,000 (Paton 432). Being as prosperous as he was, he only had to places to
spend his money: his two daughters, Lizzie and her older sister Emma (Paton
432). Andrew Borden also had a wife, Abby Borden. She was the stepmother of
Lizzie and Emma and a hated one at that. Whenever Lizzie and Abby were together
in the house, which happened a lot, “the atmosphere was electric” (Paton 433).
Abby was called Mrs. Borden, and Lizzie did not eat when Abby was around. Their
relationship was so distant, that Lizzie only spoke to her when it was needed (Paton
433). Lizzie first despised Abby when Andrew decided to purchase Abby’s sister’s
home and have it in his wife’s name.
This prevented his sister-in-law from
getting evicted, but Lizzie saw it as a chance for Abby to take advantage of
Andrew’s money (Paton 433). What most people do not know, is that Lizzie had
somewhat of a criminal record before she was charged with the murder. The first
was committed in her own home. She had reported to her father that some of
Abby’s stuff had been stolen by a thief. Andrew called the police but stopped
them in the middle of their investigation because he noticed that the only
person that could have committed the crime was Lizzier herself (Paton 433).
Perhaps the only reason Lizzie may have had any hate for her father was when he
laid her pigeons to rest. Intruders had broken into the garden of the Bordens’,
where Lizzie’s pigeons were held. Mr. Borden assumed that the intruders were
after the birds and therefore, decapitated the birds with and ax (Paton 434).
Could this be a sign? 1892 was a year of record breaking heat. It seemed to have
been 12 months of total summer (Paton 434). That summer, Lizzie bought small
doses in several visits of prussic acid, a lethal drug. The drugstore owners
started to notice, which caused her to make her visits more discreet (Paton
434). The day of August 4th was a day that would make history. It started out
normal. Emma was not in town, and there was a guest staying in the house, Uncle
John Morse. Bridget Sullivan, the maid, was up with Uncle John as she did her
daily chores. She stopped short, however, because of a sickness she had had
recently (Paton 435).
Then, with John gone into town and Bridget cleaning the
windows, the murders happened. At 9:00 AM, Abby Borden was killed. With nothing
more worse happening, Andrew Borden was then killed two and a half hours later,
at 11:30 AM (Sams 1). There were 20 wounds from a sharp instrument on Abby and
only 10 on Andrew (Paton 432). Lizzie supposedly saw only her father dead. She
ran to the neighbours and cried that her father had been killed. She said her
mother had gotten a note, asking her to go aid an ill person. So obviously,
Lizzie did not know that Abby was in the house dead. The police got there, and
they found Abby’s corpse in a bedroom. Then for some odd reason, Lizzie
remembered that she may have heard her come back in to the house earlier (Paton
436). Lizzie’s alibi was rather odd. She said she had went out in to the
outbuilding to get a piece of metal to mend a window screen, but the police
found no broken window screens. She also said she went out there to get some
lead for fishing weights, but there was no lead to be found. She said that she
went into the loft and remembered eating pears. However, Lizzie had a touch of
the Borden sickness also, and therefore her stomach was too queasy at the time (Paton
436). The weapon was found not to far from the body. There was an ax handle on
the floor, and its blade was up on a shelf (Paton 436). There was not any way to
connect it to Lizzie because fingerprinting had not yet been used in Fall River
up until the early 1900s (Paton 436). However, it did look as if it had been
altered. There was ash smeared all over it and of course the fact that it was
broken (Sams 2). Lizzie was not apprehended at first. They went through all
possibilities before coming to Lizzie as a suspect because they had no evidence
against her (Paton 436). They ran through the possibility of another suspect. It
was found very reasonable because of the way the house was set up for someone to
just to walk in that morning.
Uncle John had gone into town, Emma was away on
short notice, Bridget had been outside washing the windows, and Lizzie was in
the outbuilding long enough for two murders (Paton 436). Lizzie and Emma Borden
were now being comforted by Alice Russell, a friend, when the police notified
them of another search. They were convinced that Lizzie was now the likely
suspect (Paton 436). The absence the puzzled everyone the most was the fact that
there were no bloodstained clothes in the house. In the murder, Lizzie would
have been soaked by both victims if she had killed them. In the search, all of
Lizzie’s clothes were found spotless (Paton 436). Another piece of missing
evidence was the note that Lizzie said Abby had received to go visit an ill
friend. The writer of the note was never heard from again, and there was no
record of a delivery. The conclusion came to be that there was no note, and
Lizzie had made it up to stall the discovery of Abby’s corpse (Sams 2). There
were four processes that happened thereafter in the investigation. During the
first, the inquest, Lizzie gave a testimony. The next was the grand jury hearing
and then the preliminary hearing. The final step was the murder trial (Sams 2).
The date of the inquest was August 10, 1892. It was the sixth day after the
murders and was suspended by Judge Blaisell the next day because he supposedly
had heard enough information for Lizzie to be arrested that evening (Sams 4).
Immediately after, Blaisell held a preliminary hearing to determine if there was
“ ... enough circumstancial evidence to warrant having the accused [Lizzie]
stand trial” (Sams 5). One the 7th of November, 1892, the grand jury was put
together. They proceeded with a hearing that lasted thirteen days. After hearing
the testimony of Lizzie’s friend, Miss Alice Russell, three indictments were put
on Lizzie. The first was the Andrew Borden’s murder, the second Abby’s murder,
and the third the murder of both Andrew and Abby (Sams 5). Alice’s testimony was
quite revealing, alongside with Emma.
They stated that before there was the
second search, Lizzie destroyed and burned a dress, saying “’Because it was all
faded and paint-stained’”(Paton 436). Alice then later said that she no paint on
the dress before Lizzie destroyed, then implying that it was not smart to let
them see her burn it (Paton 436). The last testimony, and perhaps one of the
most damning, was of Inspector William H. Medley. He had gone up into the loft
and said the only thing that was up there were his own footsteps lying in the
dust (Sams 6). Lizzie, who did not ever testify, said only a few words the
entire trial. She looked at the jury and said, “’I am innocent. I leave it to my
counsel to speak for me’”(Sams 7). The jury then went back for only and hour and
a half. The decision was then stated in the court room that Lizzie Borden was
not guilty, an acquittal on the first ballot (Sams 7). Just because the trial
was over, did not mean that it was forgotten. Books such as The Trial of Lizzie
Borden, in which she was proclaimed guilty, and Lizzie Borden, The Untold Story,
whereas she was found innocent. The case was also made into plays, a ballet, a
musical revue, and an opera (Radin 268). But perhaps the most reknown one is the
children’s nursery rhyme, “Lizzie Borden took an ax/ And gave her mother forty
whacks;/ When she saw what she had done,/ She gave her father forty-one” (Radin
268). The purpose of this paper is to research the life and trial of Lizzie
Borden in order to determine if she was guilty of parricide, the murder of one’s
parents.
Lizzie Borden hated her stepmother, whom she saw as a plot to take her
father’s fortune. Her father had also killed her beloved pigeons. Lizzie had
also been making secret trips to buy lethal drugs. After the murders, Lizzie
burned clothes that may have had her parents blood. In the trial, Lizzie was
acquitted because of the lack of evidence. Perhaps this was because she did not committ the crime, or was it because she was smart in covering her tracks? The
researcher of this paper believes Lizzie Borden to be the true murderer. This is
concluded because of the fact that Abby Borden was so greatly despised by
Lizzie. The question is, was it enough to kill her? The researcher says yes
because she was obviously not in her right mind. She had stolen her
step-mother’s belongings and tried to claim it as someone else’s wrongdoings.
The researcher believes that Andrew walked in and saw what she had done. Lizzie
paniced, and in a rage, killed her father without thinking of it. She then
covered her self up and tried to forget about it, thinking it would go away. But
it did not. It stayed in a place in history, a place that would be remembered
forever.
|