Chinese Book Report
China Book Report Book: China Since 1945 Author: Stewart Ross (Note: This
book is not described in full depth and detail but is just explained in a very
general way, therefore Mahmoud Abdelkader uses The Modernization of China by
Gilbert Rozman (Editor) excerpts to support his views) Type of Book: Illustrated
Pages: 64 China Book Report The book China Since 1945, written by author Stewart
Ross, opens in a description of the Chinese Empire in the 1900’s. There it
describes the terrain of the Chinese lands and thoroughly states the fact of
having the Great Wall of China to keep out the barbarians at 221 B.C. The author
uses a very admiring tone of the Chinese Empire and seems to think it’s one of
the very few best empires that have ever formed. In fact, Rozman states, ‘ …the
cultural and scientific achievements of the Chinese had been immense, including
the invention of paper, printing and gunpowder, and the creation of the most
exquisite paintings and by most “Empire Critics” China was one of the best
Civilizations around. The author starts the book by Revolution and
disintegration incident that happened in 1911, where the British and Japanese
fought over control of China. Chinese prisoners were being led away for
execution during the revolution where they would be beheaded with swords, which
the author states is very popular. It mentions the presidency of Sun Yatsen and
his reforms which he could not control that he made himself in 1912. Around this
time, “warlords” took over China controlling it and ruining its economy. The
author moves on to war that involved China and its neighbors. It describes the
Communist Revolution and Mao Zedong, an the “Autumn Harvest.” The author then
relates to Mao’s victory in 1945-1949 and the Japanese forces pulling out. The
author’s view toward Chinese views is very critical and then goes to analysis of
the book, but supports China. In fact, the way that this was looked upon, is
that this is actually a bunch of essays that were put together by the author
that’s why his mood changes. The only way of finding out what the author really
thinks is the way of his introduction.
The author, actually, does support China
and doesn’t take a prejudice side to it. Rozman says, “Although critics
sometimes critique China and its imperialistic ways, I find it most innovating
that China is superior in many of its way and its technologies that keep us
alive today are immense and should be recognized as an act of a strong economic
nation, not as a communist ‘death hole’.” He completely wants the reader to
understand that he has no offense on China, but China has an effect on itself
from many other critics. Stewart Ross on the other hand, uses China in a
horrible sense or criticism. He critiques China after 1945 in almost anyway he
can. His tone doesn’t sound biased, but after the first 10 pages, the book
starts taking a negative effect towards China. He starts the book as if it is
the most intriguing country in the world, but soon it his enthusiasm descends to
a lower degree. The conclusion that the reader would be able to see is that the
actual author isn’t biased about China but about Communism, since it affected
China in every way after 1945. The writing of the book looks as if it is
directed to any American who is interested in China’s modern history. The book
is written by an American author who directs his views to another American. He
directs China from Chinese eyes. He doesn’t exactly point it out that there is
conflict and doesn’t show any biased thoughts or actions. He simply just states
facts and doesn’t try to criticize it through Chinese eyes, but directs his
views as if his research team was the one that was having trouble figuring
something out. This may be unclear but I’ll state an example. “The team didn’t
know how many millions of people died in the Land Reform, but we’re pretty sure
it’s around 35%.” It is explained that the cruelty of the Chinese during land
reforms are extremely harsh, for the landlords were taken from their lands,
leaving the warlords to take the peons and control the economy. Not 35% died,
but about 20% did, by the Grolier Encyclopedia (2000).
The author extremely
exaggerated the number too highly to show cruelty but obviously and neutral or
un-biased person will bluntly state the real fact, so that leaves us with one
thing, the author obviously is biased. The author’s work on this book is
extremely beneficial and has a lot of effort in it. He completely parallels
himself to the study of China going on in Dulaney. He starts with the Tang
Dynasty to the Manchu Dynasty. He tells us that the Manchu’s were the highest
point in the history of its great landmass. The book’s theme is that China has
changed after 1945 and it will never return to its original ways. Indeed, the
Chinese Empire fell within the Communist rise of Mao Zedong and it will never
re-establish. In class, the study of China after 1945 parallels directly with
the book’s theme and it shows that this major move of Communism has changed the
world. The United States was quite shocked and developed a kind of hatred for
the Chinese, but would not show it. The unit next that will be studied is how
the United States was so shocked when Mao Zedong declared the People’s Republic
of China and reacted in a very immature way. The theme also parallels to the
Chinese as a once superior race to the disgrace of turning into Communists. It
shows the decline and fall of the Empire and many of its disadvantages and
advantages. Ross describes the Chinese as a race once full of nothing but
resources and was heavily dependent on to almost how is it to acquire the pure
hatred that we have for Russians to the Chinese. In other words, this book was
overall good but it would have been better to compare a book of un-biased views
to this book. The author hides his biased views very good, but using many simple
techniques and other sources, it was obvious that he’s biased. The book gives no
accurate description of China’s past, but it does give a clear overview. After
that, Ross starts to take sides with Communism. The book is written all about a
negative view of Communism and maybe that’s why he has a biased overview. The
other book, The Modernization of China by Rozman is extremely useful to compare
a biased view to a neutral view. It points out much other information that the
Ross left out. Overall, I though both books were great and I have learned a lot.
|