Aristotle: A Comprehensive View On Nature And Society
In order to fully understand Aristotle's views on a natural system, it is
necessary to first explain some general principles of his philosophy. It is in
his work the Categories that Aristotle presents the concept of substance, a
concept which will serve as the foundation for much of his philosophical system.
Substance, for Aristotle, is not a universal, but rather, it is the particular;
substance is not a ?such,? but a ?this.? Thus, substance is neither in nor is it
said of a subject (as are qualities). Rather it is that which makes the subject
numerically one; it is that which makes the subject the individual. Substance is
an individual man and [or] an individual horse. Aristotle still classifies
universals as substances, for they define what constitutes the substance, and
without these universals, a substance would not be what is. There are four
characteristics of substances: a substance is a ?this?, not a qualification or a
'such' (which stresses individuality); a substance has no contraries to it
(there are no opposites of a substance); a substance does not admit more or less
(there are not degrees of a substance); and a substance can admit contraries
while remaining numerically one. In the Physics, Aristotle addresses that which
constitutes Natural Objects as substances. He states that all Natural Substances
consist of both form and matter. Matter is that out of which the substance
arises and form is that into which the matter develops. In building a table, the
wood, nails, etc., are the matter, and the idea of a table, what the end result
will be, is the form, according to Aristotle. Matter and form are inseparable
from each other; there is no 'form' apart from concrete things.
Aristotle
explains that all substances contain within themselves the origin of their
change and movement. He continues by stating that the change which can occur is
due to four possible natural causes: formal cause, material cause, efficient
cause, and final cause. Formal and material cause are self explanatory, in that
it is the form or the matter of the substance which is responsible for the
change within the substance. Efficient and final cause, however, will become
more clear once we investigate Aristotle's ideas of actuality and potentiality.
We should begin the explanation of actuality and potentially by saying that form
can be seen as the actuality of the substance while matter is the potential for
that form to exist. The best way to illustrate this is through the analogy of
the building of a house. The materials, bricks and wood, should be seen as the
matter, the potentially to become a house. The end-result, the house, is the
form, it is the potential made actual. The building of the house itself, the
movement, is analogous to the four types of causes Aristotle says exist in
substances. In the case of this analogy the builder would be the efficient cause
in that it is he/she who initiates the change. One could also say that there is
a final or teleological cause taking place as well, that the motive is to build
a house which serves the purpose of ?house-ness?, namely that the house is one
in which people can live. Through this analogy one can begin to see the nature
of each of the causes which can exist within a given substance. Once we see how
Aristotle's ideas of actuality and potentially relate to his ideas of form and
matter (matter is potentiality, form is it's actuality), which necessarily
relate to substance, we can almost begin the analysis of his philosophy on an
ethical system. First, however, an introduction to the idea of the ?Unmoved
Mover? is necessary. In accordance with Aristotle's teleological view of the
natural world, the ?Unmoved Mover? is a purely actual thing which motivates all
things toward the ?good.? All things try to achieve completeness, full
actuality, or perfection; this implies that there must exist an object or state
towards which this striving or desire is directed. This object or state is the
?Unmoved Mover.?