The highest rates of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder
(CD) are found in low-income welfare families. The Head Start program is for the
“continued enhancement of services for poor children ages zero to five, and
their families.” The parents of the children in the Head Start program are
rarely examined. Head Start instead focuses on the academic performance of the
involved children. The article, “Preventing Conduct Problems in Head Start
Children: Strengthening Parenting Competencies” in The Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology decides to take a different approach. Instead of singling
out the child and holding only the child responsible for their social and
academic behavior, they put the responsibility on the family, the school as well
as the child. Nine centers were chosen from within one large urban Head Start
district (representing six school districts) on the basis of their similarity in
terms of ethnic minority percentages, teachers qualifications, family service
workers qualifications and education, number of classrooms, number of children,
children's enrollment age, and length of Head Start class (4 hr per day).
Another factor was their willingness to participate in the study and to be
randomly assigned to either the intervention group (PARTNERS), which is supposed
to be an early prevention group to prevent the development of ODD and CD in
young children. Or being randomly assigned to the CONTROL group (Head Starts
regular curriculum). The Nine Head Start centers were randomly assigned to
either groups. This is a plus because the whole center, not just a few classes
in the center, is involved in the chosen program. Also, the centers didn’t
debate on which program that they’d like to participate in. There were more
families in the experimental group than in the control group. The Partners or
Control program is the independent variable (depending on which group the child
is a part of). The child’s conduct is the dependent variable.
Words: 317