|
Hamlet is a play written by William Shakespeare that very closely follows the
dramatic conventions of revenge in Elizabethan theater. All revenge tragedies
originally stemmed from the Greeks, who wrote and performed the first plays.
After the Greeks came Seneca who was very influential to all Elizabethan tragedy
writers. Seneca who was Roman, basically set all of the ideas and the norms for
all revenge play writers in the Renaissance era including William Shakespeare.
The two most famous English revenge tragedies written in the Elizabethan era
were Hamlet, written by Shakespeare and The Spanish Tragedy, written by Thomas
Kyd. These two plays used mostly all of the Elizabethan conventions for revenge
tragedies in their plays.
Hamlet especially incorporated all revenge conventions
in one way or another, which truly made Hamlet a typical revenge play.
“Shakespeare’s Hamlet is one of many heroes of the Elizabethan and Jacobean
stage who finds himself grievously wronged by a powerful figure, with no
recourse to the law, and with a crime against his family to avenge.” Seneca was
among the greatest authors of classical tragedies and there was not one educated
Elizabethan who was unaware of him or his plays. There were certain stylistic
and different strategically thought out devices that Elizabethan playwrights
including Shakespeare learned and used from Seneca’s great tragedies. The five
act structure, the appearance of some kind of ghost, the one line exchanges
known as stichomythia, and Seneca’s use of long rhetorical speeches were all
later used in tragedies by Elizabethan playwrights.
Some of Seneca’s ideas were
originally taken from the Greeks when the Romans conquered Greece, and with it
they took home many Greek theatrical ideas. Some of Seneca’s stories that
originated from the Greeks like Agamemnon and Thyestes which dealt with bloody
family histories and revenge captivated the Elizabethans. Seneca’s stories
weren’t really written for performance purposes, so if English playwrights liked
his ideas, they had to figure out a way to make the story theatrically workable,
relevant and exciting to the Elizabethan audience who were very demanding.
Seneca’s influence formed part of a developing tradition of tragedies whose
plots hinge on political power, forbidden sexuality, family honor and private
revenge. “There was no author who exercised a wider or deeper influence upon the
Elizabethan mind or upon the Elizabethan form of tragedy than did Seneca.” For
the dramatists of Renaissance Italy, France and England, classical tragedy meant
only the ten Latin plays of Seneca and not Euripides, Aeschylus and Sophocles.
“Hamlet is certainly not much like any play of Seneca’s one can name, but Seneca
is undoubtedly one of the effective ingredients in the emotional charge of
Hamlet. Hamlet without Seneca is inconceivable.” During the time of Elizabethan
theater, plays about tragedy and revenge were very common and a regular
convention seemed to be formed on what aspects should be put into a typical
revenge tragedy. In all revenge tragedies first and foremost, a crime is
committed and for various reasons laws and justice cannot punish the crime so
the individual who is the main character, goes through with the revenge in spite
of everything. The main character then usually had a period of doubt , where he
tries to decide whether or not to go through with the revenge, which usually
involves tough and complex planning. Other features that were typical were the
appearance of a ghost, to get the revenger to go through with the deed.
The revenger also usually had a very close relationship with the audience through
soliloquies and asides. The original crime that will eventually be avenged is
nearly always sexual or violent or both. The crime has been committed against a
family member of the revenger. “ The revenger places himself outside the normal
moral order of things, and often becomes more isolated as the play progresses-an
isolation which at its most extreme becomes madness.” The revenge must be the
cause of a catastrophe and the beginning of the revenge must start immediately
after the crisis. After the ghost persuades the revenger to commit his deed, a
hesitation first occurs and then a delay by the avenger before killing the
murderer, and his actual or acted out madness.
The revenge must be taken out by
the revenger or his trusted accomplices. The revenger and his accomplices may
also die at the moment of success or even during the course of revenge. It
should not be assumed that revenge plays parallel the moral expectations of the
Elizabethan audience. Church, State and the regular morals of people in that age
did not accept revenge, instead they thought that revenge would simply not under
any circumstances be tolerated no matter what the original deed was. “ It is
repugnant on theological grounds, since Christian orthodoxy posits a world
ordered by Divine Providence, in which revenge is a sin and a blasphemy,
endangering the soul of the revenger.” The revenger by taking law into his own
hands was in turn completely going against the total political authority of the
state. People should therefore never think that revenge was expected by
Elizabethan society.
|